In Japan, Robot Tables Serve You
Writing by Evan Ackerman on Thursday, 11 of December , 2008 at 6:01 am
Info is scanty on this little robot table, but it apparently uses an “inverted pendulum” to keep its balance (I’m trying to picture that in my head and I’m not getting anywhere). I wish I knew a little bit more, specifically about how it manages to navigate, although based on its behavior and form factor I’m guessing it’s remote controlled. If anyone wants to take a crack at the original article in Japanese and pass on the details, I’d be much obliged.
[ Robot Watch (Translated) ] VIA [ Robot Living ]
Comments (4)
Category: Consumer
- Add this post to
- Del.icio.us -
- Digg
Comment by Chris
Made Friday, 12 of December , 2008 at 12:28 pm
“Oh there’s my food, good. Oh it’s on some sort of robot table? Hmm, that’s a weired looking thing. Well it’s on it’s way. Man I’m hungry. Is it here yet? nope, it’s a quarter of the way. That’s like a twenty foot stretch between here and there. I bet I could walk that far in three seconds. I think it’s been a minute already and… wait a second where is that thing, I’m starving! Oh it’s getting a little closer now. I want my soup, dangit! Oh it’s halfway here. That thing has small wheels… I think in about another minute I’ll have my food. I thought this was a fast food place? I want a refund.”
Comment by Joey1058
Made Friday, 12 of December , 2008 at 3:08 pm
Good idea, but a really bad design. Too much processing power going into it’s Segway balancing act, when with two drivers and a trailing wheel to maintain balance, it can go several times as fast will less processing.
Comment by Eggshell Robotics
Made Friday, 12 of December , 2008 at 9:25 pm
Pretty cool. That “inverted pendulum” is really awesome, gives a strong effect of a human standing on legs. But, hmm, this is a restaurant, right? What will happen, if somehow smashes into the robot or incidentially hit him with his ars or so. Wouldn’t the fall robot just turn over?
Comment by Bob Mottram
Made Saturday, 13 of December , 2008 at 5:13 am
I’d love to see the out-takes on this :-)