<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RoboGames 2009: Mech Warfare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.botjunkie.com/2009/06/16/robogames-2009-mech-warfare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.botjunkie.com/2009/06/16/robogames-2009-mech-warfare/</link>
	<description>Jonesing For Robot News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:00:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: computer repair connecticut</title>
		<link>http://www.botjunkie.com/2009/06/16/robogames-2009-mech-warfare/comment-page-1/#comment-12284</link>
		<dc:creator>computer repair connecticut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.botjunkie.com/2009/06/16/robogames-2009-mech-warfare/#comment-12284</guid>
		<description>Kudos to that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudos to that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ethan454</title>
		<link>http://www.botjunkie.com/2009/06/16/robogames-2009-mech-warfare/comment-page-1/#comment-3515</link>
		<dc:creator>ethan454</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.botjunkie.com/2009/06/16/robogames-2009-mech-warfare/#comment-3515</guid>
		<description>This is pretty cool. Cept may I recomend mini paint balls instead of airsoft pellets? Ya, it might be a pain to clean it up later, but i think the audiance would realy enjoy it. It doesn&#039;t have to be paint, just something that leaves a mark...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is pretty cool. Cept may I recomend mini paint balls instead of airsoft pellets? Ya, it might be a pain to clean it up later, but i think the audiance would realy enjoy it. It doesn&#8217;t have to be paint, just something that leaves a mark&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shkirman</title>
		<link>http://www.botjunkie.com/2009/06/16/robogames-2009-mech-warfare/comment-page-1/#comment-3481</link>
		<dc:creator>shkirman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.botjunkie.com/2009/06/16/robogames-2009-mech-warfare/#comment-3481</guid>
		<description>There were a couple quads that worked well enough to get in the arena and fight each other</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were a couple quads that worked well enough to get in the arena and fight each other</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Ferguson</title>
		<link>http://www.botjunkie.com/2009/06/16/robogames-2009-mech-warfare/comment-page-1/#comment-3430</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ferguson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.botjunkie.com/2009/06/16/robogames-2009-mech-warfare/#comment-3430</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve posted a video of the on-board view from my bot Issy (the white robot in the video above) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmABWJHq-0w

-Fergs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve posted a video of the on-board view from my bot Issy (the white robot in the video above) <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmABWJHq-0w" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmABWJHq-0w</a></p>
<p>-Fergs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Alter</title>
		<link>http://www.botjunkie.com/2009/06/16/robogames-2009-mech-warfare/comment-page-1/#comment-3421</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Alter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.botjunkie.com/2009/06/16/robogames-2009-mech-warfare/#comment-3421</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the video and the pictures Evan! 

Overall we had a blast. I&#039;ve said from the beginning that Year 1 of Mech Warfare was going to be our learning year. With as much that was required to work well to make the event even happen, I&#039;m just happy that we got out there and did it. Bottom line is, we had a lot of fun and we learned a TON. We&#039;re using everything we took in from this year to make next year even better, and hopefully by then we&#039;ll have more bots up and running... 

We demonstrated Murphy&#039;s Law perfectly though! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the video and the pictures Evan! </p>
<p>Overall we had a blast. I&#8217;ve said from the beginning that Year 1 of Mech Warfare was going to be our learning year. With as much that was required to work well to make the event even happen, I&#8217;m just happy that we got out there and did it. Bottom line is, we had a lot of fun and we learned a TON. We&#8217;re using everything we took in from this year to make next year even better, and hopefully by then we&#8217;ll have more bots up and running&#8230; </p>
<p>We demonstrated Murphy&#8217;s Law perfectly though! :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Ackerman</title>
		<link>http://www.botjunkie.com/2009/06/16/robogames-2009-mech-warfare/comment-page-1/#comment-3419</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Ackerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.botjunkie.com/2009/06/16/robogames-2009-mech-warfare/#comment-3419</guid>
		<description>To be honest, the schedules over the weekend kinda went out the window, and I was trying to get video of combat and hockey AND Mech Warfare all at the same time. I think there may have been 4 quads that spent some time in the arena, but the two that you see in the majority of the video were the only ones that were working even somewhat reliably. I didn&#039;t personally see any working bipeds, but there may have been one? Trossen Robotics was taking video of the entire event, and when they&#039;ve got it put together, I&#039;ll be reposting it here if I can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest, the schedules over the weekend kinda went out the window, and I was trying to get video of combat and hockey AND Mech Warfare all at the same time. I think there may have been 4 quads that spent some time in the arena, but the two that you see in the majority of the video were the only ones that were working even somewhat reliably. I didn&#8217;t personally see any working bipeds, but there may have been one? Trossen Robotics was taking video of the entire event, and when they&#8217;ve got it put together, I&#8217;ll be reposting it here if I can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Log1c</title>
		<link>http://www.botjunkie.com/2009/06/16/robogames-2009-mech-warfare/comment-page-1/#comment-3418</link>
		<dc:creator>Log1c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.botjunkie.com/2009/06/16/robogames-2009-mech-warfare/#comment-3418</guid>
		<description>I saw 3 different robots, was that all that ended up making it on the field?

The mech-warfare site showed quite a few more in development.

Pretty cool for a first run of things. I&#039;d love to compete if I had the time (and a bit of extra funds laying around).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw 3 different robots, was that all that ended up making it on the field?</p>
<p>The mech-warfare site showed quite a few more in development.</p>
<p>Pretty cool for a first run of things. I&#8217;d love to compete if I had the time (and a bit of extra funds laying around).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

