<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lockheed Martin SAMARAI UAV Scares Me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.botjunkie.com/2009/09/28/lockheed-martin-samarai-uav-scares-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.botjunkie.com/2009/09/28/lockheed-martin-samarai-uav-scares-me/</link>
	<description>Jonesing For Robot News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:18:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JoeDee</title>
		<link>http://www.botjunkie.com/2009/09/28/lockheed-martin-samarai-uav-scares-me/comment-page-1/#comment-7036</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeDee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 01:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.botjunkie.com/?p=2776#comment-7036</guid>
		<description>You have to understand a focus group here.  This is for the recon group that cannot carry a lot of weight.  It will quitly be radio controled and feed real time imaging so that someone can quickly resolve who or what is over that hill.  In harsh weather, the imaging is no good, so who cares if ti can fly or not.  All of these version you see are concepts, and have not had any real money put into them.  The final product will perform well,a nd will be capable of flying at low altitudes in reasonable winds.  Enjoy the input, however you may take it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to understand a focus group here.  This is for the recon group that cannot carry a lot of weight.  It will quitly be radio controled and feed real time imaging so that someone can quickly resolve who or what is over that hill.  In harsh weather, the imaging is no good, so who cares if ti can fly or not.  All of these version you see are concepts, and have not had any real money put into them.  The final product will perform well,a nd will be capable of flying at low altitudes in reasonable winds.  Enjoy the input, however you may take it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cringe</title>
		<link>http://www.botjunkie.com/2009/09/28/lockheed-martin-samarai-uav-scares-me/comment-page-1/#comment-6942</link>
		<dc:creator>cringe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 02:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.botjunkie.com/?p=2776#comment-6942</guid>
		<description>nnnnnnnnnnnooooooooooo wwwwwwwwwwaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyy

under endurance these fragile delicate things wont even be able to hover for 3 minutes in harsh weather. where monocopters like these have to live</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nnnnnnnnnnnooooooooooo wwwwwwwwwwaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyy</p>
<p>under endurance these fragile delicate things wont even be able to hover for 3 minutes in harsh weather. where monocopters like these have to live</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cringe</title>
		<link>http://www.botjunkie.com/2009/09/28/lockheed-martin-samarai-uav-scares-me/comment-page-1/#comment-6941</link>
		<dc:creator>cringe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 02:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.botjunkie.com/?p=2776#comment-6941</guid>
		<description>well if the nanomonocopter is created it could be considered under stealth and endurance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well if the nanomonocopter is created it could be considered under stealth and endurance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: comon</title>
		<link>http://www.botjunkie.com/2009/09/28/lockheed-martin-samarai-uav-scares-me/comment-page-1/#comment-6940</link>
		<dc:creator>comon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 02:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.botjunkie.com/?p=2776#comment-6940</guid>
		<description>i guess your correct cringe but particularly nanomonocopters dont help our millitary in any aspect</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i guess your correct cringe but particularly nanomonocopters dont help our millitary in any aspect</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cringe</title>
		<link>http://www.botjunkie.com/2009/09/28/lockheed-martin-samarai-uav-scares-me/comment-page-1/#comment-6939</link>
		<dc:creator>cringe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 02:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.botjunkie.com/?p=2776#comment-6939</guid>
		<description>darpa isnt completely wasting the money that go into these experiments. experiments like these are the ones that open a whole new chapter in monocopters</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>darpa isnt completely wasting the money that go into these experiments. experiments like these are the ones that open a whole new chapter in monocopters</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: comon</title>
		<link>http://www.botjunkie.com/2009/09/28/lockheed-martin-samarai-uav-scares-me/comment-page-1/#comment-6938</link>
		<dc:creator>comon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 02:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.botjunkie.com/?p=2776#comment-6938</guid>
		<description>joey1058 points out a very strong point that these nanomonocopters will be completley dictated by winds especially at high altidudes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>joey1058 points out a very strong point that these nanomonocopters will be completley dictated by winds especially at high altidudes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xt@z</title>
		<link>http://www.botjunkie.com/2009/09/28/lockheed-martin-samarai-uav-scares-me/comment-page-1/#comment-5318</link>
		<dc:creator>Xt@z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.botjunkie.com/?p=2776#comment-5318</guid>
		<description>Wow ! It doesn&#039;t look that controlled... o_O It looks more like an insane boomerang than a controled vehicule... lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow ! It doesn&#8217;t look that controlled&#8230; o_O It looks more like an insane boomerang than a controled vehicule&#8230; lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Parekh</title>
		<link>http://www.botjunkie.com/2009/09/28/lockheed-martin-samarai-uav-scares-me/comment-page-1/#comment-4781</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Parekh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.botjunkie.com/?p=2776#comment-4781</guid>
		<description>That second video is scary! I can just imagine that thing buzzing through dozens of spectators before crashing to the ground.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That second video is scary! I can just imagine that thing buzzing through dozens of spectators before crashing to the ground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey1058</title>
		<link>http://www.botjunkie.com/2009/09/28/lockheed-martin-samarai-uav-scares-me/comment-page-1/#comment-4774</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey1058</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.botjunkie.com/?p=2776#comment-4774</guid>
		<description>This seems to be one of those &quot;we have money lying around, so lets throw it at a project no matter how dumb&quot; ideas.  DARPA needs to realize that not every stupid idea they come up with will work.  They&#039;re called monocopters for a reason.  They are already starting from an established height off the ground.  And they just float along on the wind.  They need to stick with that concept, and abandon the crazy notion of launching from the ground.  Take however many thousands up in a drone, open the tiny little bay doors, and drop &#039;em like bombs.  They will be in the air quite long enough to broadcast whatever silly bits of people in their underwear are doing.  Colored the same as the maple seeds they&#039;re modeled after, they will be ignored and quietly dissolve into the ground, except they won&#039;t grow spy camera trees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems to be one of those &#8220;we have money lying around, so lets throw it at a project no matter how dumb&#8221; ideas.  DARPA needs to realize that not every stupid idea they come up with will work.  They&#8217;re called monocopters for a reason.  They are already starting from an established height off the ground.  And they just float along on the wind.  They need to stick with that concept, and abandon the crazy notion of launching from the ground.  Take however many thousands up in a drone, open the tiny little bay doors, and drop &#8216;em like bombs.  They will be in the air quite long enough to broadcast whatever silly bits of people in their underwear are doing.  Colored the same as the maple seeds they&#8217;re modeled after, they will be ignored and quietly dissolve into the ground, except they won&#8217;t grow spy camera trees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
