Industrial Part Tossing Looks Like Fun, Has Questionable Practicality
Writing by Evan Ackerman on Tuesday, 29 of September , 2009 at 1:53 am
High speed robotic hands like those crazy ones we posted about in July are extremely awesome, and I’d be the first to argue that they don’t really need to be practical. Not yet, anyway. But a group from Reinhold-W├╝rth University in K├╝nzelsau (the capital of the Hohenlohe district in Germany, in case you were wondering) is trying to revolutionize automated industrial manufacturing by using high speed robot hands to throw and catch parts that would otherwise have to be transported around a factory by a conveyor belt or some other inefficient means.
There are two ways to go about throwing and catching of things, as anyone who has ever played baseball can attest to: you either need someone to throw perfectly, or you need someone to catch adaptively. Most baseball teams (with some exceptions that I won’t belabor) do their best to combine good throwing with good catching. This is inefficient, however, since you can just as effectively make due with a thrower that can reliably hit the broad side of a barn as long as you have a catcher that can cover the entirety of said barn. And that’s the idea behind this robotic system: it’s very good at catching, meaning that you don’t need a super accurate robotic throwing system. All the catching system uses is a single stationary camera (in contrast to these hands, which use at least two tracking cameras), and it can catch tennis balls with no problem. Here it is in slow motion; watch the system making small adjustments right before the catch:
As cool as this is, I have to wonder if the benefits of this type of system would really be worth the costs at this point. Conveyors are cheap and reliable, and robots are scarily good at working with objects on conveyors. In a few years time, though, my guess is that it will start making sense to utilize the potential of high speed robotics… It’s just going to take a little more development as well as a bit of a mental shift for us humans. What I mean is, at this point, industrial robotics are already much faster and more efficient than humans, but not inhumanly so (with a few exceptions). Throwing parts around a factory, however, is something totally different. You think about it, and it seems utterly crazy, and it is crazy, just not for robots. So much of robotics revolves around making robots do things in a more human-like manner, and I’m excited for the day that robotics in general, but industrial robotics specifically, takes full advantage of the potential of non-human systems.
VIA [ Plastic Pals ]
Comments (4)
Category: Industrial, Research
- Add this post to
- Del.icio.us -
- Digg
Comment by Alan Parekh
Made Tuesday, 29 of September , 2009 at 11:21 am
That is one crazy robot. I see a 100,000 automated back-catcher coming to a baseball diamond soon. :)
Comment by Joey1058
Made Wednesday, 30 of September , 2009 at 6:08 pm
I’m strangely reminded of the early 1920s – 1930s skyscraper construction movies and photos. Some guy tossing red hot rivets clear across a beam to the other guy with a bucket. You miss that puppy and it is gonna hit some pedestrian on the head, drilling into his or her skull. Never mind it’s gonna cook the brain once inside.
Granted most hirises are welded now, but there is a use for this type of robotic configuration in construction, I’m sure!
Comment by Krynoc
Made Sunday, 6 of December , 2009 at 3:02 am
The practical applications of this technology not only relate industrial machinery, but can also has some military benefits. Specifically, predicting the impact point of an airborne object could make anti-missile defense on battleships much more effective.
Comment by dmytry
Made Sunday, 6 of December , 2009 at 11:08 am
“Some guy tossing red hot rivets clear across a beam to the other guy with a bucket.”
this one, by chance?
http://dmytry.pandromeda.com/volumetrics/EMP_Final_StereoMix_Sor.mov
I worked on effects for this video, really strange to just run across (possibly) a reference to it… I think the area was cordoned off well enough so that rivets wouldn’t hit pedestrians but them could still hit workers.