<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Truck And Car Platoons Could Allow For Autonomous Driving</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.botjunkie.com/2009/11/12/truck-and-car-platoons-could-allow-for-autonomous-driving/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.botjunkie.com/2009/11/12/truck-and-car-platoons-could-allow-for-autonomous-driving/</link>
	<description>Jonesing For Robot News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:44:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.botjunkie.com/2009/11/12/truck-and-car-platoons-could-allow-for-autonomous-driving/comment-page-1/#comment-5607</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 06:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.botjunkie.com/?p=3301#comment-5607</guid>
		<description>@ Evan
Yes -- the transitions would be my main concern. We see on the highways how simple things like cell phones and radios can distract a driver. Unless you have a system that can fully take over (or at least safely disable the vehicle) in the event that the driver is unresponsive when then &quot;need&quot; to be in charge, it&#039;s a failure in my opinion.

We need to provide people with safer technologies, not more liabilities. If they, as a result of this study, come up with a very safe manner to handle all conceivable contingencies, then I&#039;ll reconsider my stance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Evan<br />
Yes &#8212; the transitions would be my main concern. We see on the highways how simple things like cell phones and radios can distract a driver. Unless you have a system that can fully take over (or at least safely disable the vehicle) in the event that the driver is unresponsive when then &#8220;need&#8221; to be in charge, it&#8217;s a failure in my opinion.</p>
<p>We need to provide people with safer technologies, not more liabilities. If they, as a result of this study, come up with a very safe manner to handle all conceivable contingencies, then I&#8217;ll reconsider my stance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spikey DaPikey</title>
		<link>http://www.botjunkie.com/2009/11/12/truck-and-car-platoons-could-allow-for-autonomous-driving/comment-page-1/#comment-5585</link>
		<dc:creator>Spikey DaPikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.botjunkie.com/?p=3301#comment-5585</guid>
		<description>If i don&#039;t have enough to worry about when on my motorbike !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If i don&#8217;t have enough to worry about when on my motorbike !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Ackerman</title>
		<link>http://www.botjunkie.com/2009/11/12/truck-and-car-platoons-could-allow-for-autonomous-driving/comment-page-1/#comment-5581</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Ackerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.botjunkie.com/?p=3301#comment-5581</guid>
		<description>@ Dan

You mean, just because of the transitions in and out of the platoon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Dan</p>
<p>You mean, just because of the transitions in and out of the platoon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.botjunkie.com/2009/11/12/truck-and-car-platoons-could-allow-for-autonomous-driving/comment-page-1/#comment-5578</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.botjunkie.com/?p=3301#comment-5578</guid>
		<description>@Anastasios

Correct, which is why I agree the study has some merit. It&#039;s actually been done before by the CMU NavLab -- back in the 80s. The live demo they did in CA went flawlessly -- it was never implemented because you need either a fully autonomous system or a fully human one. Hybrid solutions still require too much responsibility from the human drive while implying a lower attentiveness requirement.

That puts the hybrid (human+robot) vehicle at high risk, thus jeopardizing the safety for all drivers...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Anastasios</p>
<p>Correct, which is why I agree the study has some merit. It&#8217;s actually been done before by the CMU NavLab &#8212; back in the 80s. The live demo they did in CA went flawlessly &#8212; it was never implemented because you need either a fully autonomous system or a fully human one. Hybrid solutions still require too much responsibility from the human drive while implying a lower attentiveness requirement.</p>
<p>That puts the hybrid (human+robot) vehicle at high risk, thus jeopardizing the safety for all drivers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anastasios-Antonios Toulkeridis</title>
		<link>http://www.botjunkie.com/2009/11/12/truck-and-car-platoons-could-allow-for-autonomous-driving/comment-page-1/#comment-5574</link>
		<dc:creator>Anastasios-Antonios Toulkeridis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.botjunkie.com/?p=3301#comment-5574</guid>
		<description>Dan, r u referring to traditional..um..trains?.
As i recall no traditional train drives one straight home</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, r u referring to traditional..um..trains?.<br />
As i recall no traditional train drives one straight home</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.botjunkie.com/2009/11/12/truck-and-car-platoons-could-allow-for-autonomous-driving/comment-page-1/#comment-5569</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.botjunkie.com/?p=3301#comment-5569</guid>
		<description>I can see how this could be useful in some cases, but isn&#039;t there a technology that&#039;s been around a lot longer -- called the train...? If you&#039;re going to have &quot;dumb&quot; vehicles that don&#039;t do waypoint navigation and simply follow the leader, then separate locomotion systems for each car in the platoon seems wasteful.

The other great thing about trains is the separation is automatically maintained... you just have to be careful when crossing an intersection - slow down for yellow and all that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see how this could be useful in some cases, but isn&#8217;t there a technology that&#8217;s been around a lot longer &#8212; called the train&#8230;? If you&#8217;re going to have &#8220;dumb&#8221; vehicles that don&#8217;t do waypoint navigation and simply follow the leader, then separate locomotion systems for each car in the platoon seems wasteful.</p>
<p>The other great thing about trains is the separation is automatically maintained&#8230; you just have to be careful when crossing an intersection &#8211; slow down for yellow and all that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
